One distinction worth emphasizing is that a successful pilot proves the workflow can work, while production readiness proves it can keep working when assumptions break. Those are very different thresholds.
In production AI projects at IT Path Solutions, I’d pay particular attention to the failure paths that pilots often under-test: stale or unavailable data, partial integration failures, incorrect outputs, and changes in model behavior after an update. Each needs a defined recovery or escalation path, not just a monitoring alert.
I’d also make the scale-up gate evidence-based. Before expanding access, teams should know the acceptable failure rate, who owns incidents, how outputs are evaluated after changes, and when a human must take over. If those answers depend on the original pilot team being constantly available, the technology may be ready, but the operating model isn’t.
One distinction worth emphasizing is that a successful pilot proves the workflow can work, while production readiness proves it can keep working when assumptions break. Those are very different thresholds.
In production AI projects at IT Path Solutions, I’d pay particular attention to the failure paths that pilots often under-test: stale or unavailable data, partial integration failures, incorrect outputs, and changes in model behavior after an update. Each needs a defined recovery or escalation path, not just a monitoring alert.
I’d also make the scale-up gate evidence-based. Before expanding access, teams should know the acceptable failure rate, who owns incidents, how outputs are evaluated after changes, and when a human must take over. If those answers depend on the original pilot team being constantly available, the technology may be ready, but the operating model isn’t.