Mohan

Congrats on the beta launch, Akash! 21 Indian languages plus waiting on document.fonts.ready is exactly what bilingual resumes need, and the DELETE endpoint with auto-cleanup covers the trust part nicely. Bookmarking it for when I revisit PDF export.

Good to know own experience counts. I guess the next step is checking it isn't just my problem before building too much. Thanks for the framework!

Thanks Kelyn! Fixed weights makes sense, easier to reason about when a result looks off. Looking forward to the follow-up, will keep an eye out for it.

Leaving the numbers in is what makes this useful. "A thread with twenty readers doesn't have many to lend" is a great way to put it. As a solo founder doing build-in-public across a few platforms, I've been treating every reply as the same effort, and this is a good reason not to. Checking a post's view count before replying is such a simple filter. Did the ranked threads beat the 1–2 view baseline on day two?

"What does the workaround cost?" is the question I'd put first. When I built ResumeOrbitz, the problem came from my own job switch: resume sites let you write for free, then charge you at Download. The workaround (paying, or rebuilding the resume in a doc) had a clear cost, which made the problem easy to believe in. Does Problem Filter weigh a founder's own experience differently from evidence gathered from other users?

Hey Usama, just circling back on the handler skeleton. Still keen to see it whenever you get a minute, no rush. And congrats on getting EpicNotes live!

Weekly, I think. A fixed Monday check is easier to stick to than reacting to spikes, and the quiet weeks probably say more about activation anyway. A spike usually just means a post did well, not that onboarding got better.

That's a smart way to frame it. A middle ground I like: if a formatting trap is found, show it first since it can make every other check meaningless. If there isn't one, lead with keywords because that's the quickest win. Worth testing both orders once there's enough traffic to compare. Thanks for pushing on this!

Thanks Praneet! It's still early, so I don't have enough users for a clean pattern yet. My bet is keyword match, because it's the most obvious to act on: you see the missing word, you add it. The irony is that formatting traps usually matter more, since a two-column layout can scramble the whole parse, but they feel less urgent than a missing keyword. Going to watch which one people actually fix first and maybe write it up once I have real numbers.

That's the cleanest setup I've seen. A SELECT-only role plus a separate TablePlus connection means the "oops" needs two mistakes instead of one. Setting it up this week before I get comfortable running queries in the dashboard editor. Thanks Praneet!